Brad Pitt responded to new accusations from Angelina Jolie and revealed the unpleasant truth about her.
It seems that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie still have feelings for each other, but we just can’t call them warm, alas. Let us remind you that the divorce of the most beautiful couple in Hollywood lasted for eight long years and ended in the defeat of the “Fight Club” star: he lost custody of the children to his ex-wife, and also could not regain the Chateau Miraval winery in France.
However, this was not enough for Jolie. After winning in court, the actress admitted that she had suffered physical abuse from her husband long before 2016, when, in the midst of an argument on a private plane, Brad first raised his hand against one of their children. Since then, according to Angelina, he tried by hook or by crook to force her to remain silent and not share scandalous facts from their family life with the public. So, at an early stage of the trial over the vineyards, Pitt put forward a strict condition: he was ready to buy out the actress’s share in Chateau Miraval only if she signed a non-disclosure agreement. As the Daily Mail learned, Jolie was deeply outraged by such a “cruel” attempt by her ex-husband to control her life and limit freedom of speech and she refused further negotiations, and with them the chance for a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
And now journalists have Pitt’s answer at their disposal. According to the British tabloid, he called Jolie a hypocrite, because the actress herself regularly requires her employees and domestic workers to sign non-disclosure agreements. Brad’s lawyers insist that Angelina should make these documents public – because if she ever stopped people from talking about what was happening in her house and how she treated her children and Pitt, then her arguments about freedom of speech do not stand up to any reason. critics.
“The same applies to any non-disclosure agreement between Jolie and any third party with whom she is in a relationship or who has helped care for the couple’s children,” according to court documents obtained by the Daily Mail.
In general, the only thing that is clear in this confusing story is that nothing is clear. In the end, even the couple’s children found themselves on opposite sides of the barricades in this war of ex-spouses.
